Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] writes:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:25:03PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
quoted
int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
const struct bpf_prog *prog,
- const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog,
+ const struct bpf_prog *dst_prog,
so you really did blind search and replace?
That's not at all what I was asking.
The function is called check_attach_target and the argument name
'tgt_prog' fits perfectly.
Initially I did, and then I realised basically what you were saying, and
started to undo some of the conversions. Guess I landed somewhere
in-between... Will fix, and resend patches 4-10. Thanks!
-Toke