Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 2 authors, 2020-09-24

Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add raw_tp_test_run

From: Andrii Nakryiko <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-24 20:09:40
Also in: bpf

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 6:55 PM Song Liu [off-list ref] wrote:
This test runs test_run for raw_tracepoint program. The test covers ctx
input, retval output, and running on correct cpu.

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <redacted>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_test_run.c          | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/progs/test_raw_tp_test_run.c          | 25 ++++++
 2 files changed, 104 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/raw_tp_test_run.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_raw_tp_test_run.c
[...]
+       test_attr.ctx_size_in = sizeof(args);
+       err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&test_attr);
+       CHECK(err < 0, "test_run", "err %d\n", errno);
+       CHECK(test_attr.retval != expected_retval, "check_retval",
+             "expect 0x%x, got 0x%x\n", expected_retval, test_attr.retval);
+
+       for (i = 0; i < nr_online; i++)
nit: this for loop is so multi-line that it deserves {}
+               if (online[i]) {
+                       DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts,
+                               .ctx_in = args,
+                               .ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
+                               .flags = BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU,
+                               .retval = 0,
+                               .cpu = i,
+                       );
+
+                       err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(
+                               bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.rename), &opts);
+                       CHECK(err < 0, "test_run_opts", "err %d\n", errno);
+                       CHECK(skel->data->on_cpu != i, "check_on_cpu",
+                             "expect %d got %d\n", i, skel->data->on_cpu);
+                       CHECK(opts.retval != expected_retval,
+                             "check_retval", "expect 0x%x, got 0x%x\n",
+                             expected_retval, opts.retval);
+               }
as I mentioned in the first patch, let's have a test specifying
ridiculous CPU and see if it properly fails and doesn't cause any
kernel warning
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+cleanup:
+       close(comm_fd);
+       test_raw_tp_test_run__destroy(skel);
+       free(online);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_raw_tp_test_run.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_raw_tp_test_run.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..6b356e003d16c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_raw_tp_test_run.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
nit: you don't need bpf_endian.h here, do you?
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+__u32 count = 0;
+__u32 on_cpu = 0xffffffff;
+
+SEC("raw_tp/task_rename")
+int BPF_PROG(rename, struct task_struct *task, char *comm)
+{
+
+       count++;
+       if ((__u64) task == 0x1234ULL && (__u64) comm == 0x5678ULL) {
+               on_cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
+               return (int)task + (int)comm;
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.24.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help