Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: introduce bpf_prog_test_run_xattr_opts
From: Song Liu <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-23 22:05:17
Also in:
bpf
On Sep 23, 2020, at 12:31 PM, Andrii Nakryiko [off-list ref] wrote: On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 9:55 AM Song Liu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This API supports new field cpu_plus in bpf_attr.test. Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <redacted> --- tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 13 ++++++++++++- tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 11 +++++++++++ tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 1 + 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c index 2baa1308737c8..3228dd60fa32f 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c@@ -684,7 +684,8 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run(int prog_fd, int repeat, void *data, __u32 size, return ret;} -int bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr *test_attr) +int bpf_prog_test_run_xattr_opts(struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr *test_attr, + const struct bpf_prog_test_run_opts *opts)opts are replacement for test_attr, not an addition to it. We chose to use _xattr suffix for low-level APIs previously, but it's already "taken". So I'd suggest to go with just bpf_prog_test_run_ops and have prog_fd as a first argument and then put all the rest of test_run_attr into opts.
Sounds good. I will update it this way. [...]