Re: [PATCH] [v2] wireless: Initial driver submission for pureLiFi devices

From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-09-30 09:55:32
Also in: linux-wireless, lkml

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:01:27AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:

Leon Romanovsky [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfig

b/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfig

quoted

new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ff05eaf0a8d4

--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/purelifi/Kconfig

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+config WLAN_VENDOR_PURELIFI
+	bool "pureLiFi devices"
+	default y

"N" is preferred default.

In most cases that's true, but for WLAN_VENDOR_ configs 'default y'
should be used. It's the same as with NET_VENDOR_.

I would like to challenge it, why is that?
Why do I need to set "N", every time new vendor upstreams its code?

Thanks


--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches