On 9/28/2020 11:19 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 09:35, Arend Van Spriel
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+ Uffe
On 9/27/2020 9:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
quoted
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void brcmf_sdiod_ib_irqhandler(st
brcmf_dbg(INTR, "IB intr triggered\n");
- brcmf_sdio_isr(sdiodev->bus);
+ brcmf_sdio_isr(sdiodev->bus, false);
}
Hi Uffe,
I assume the above code is okay, but want to confirm. Is the SDIO
interrupt guaranteed to be on a worker thread?
Correct.
As a matter of fact, the sdio irqs can be delivered through a couple
of different paths. The legacy (scheduled for removal), is from a
dedicated kthread. The more "modern" way is either from the context of
a threaded IRQ handler or via a workqueue.
However, there are also so-called out of band SDIO irqs, typically
routed via a separate GPIO line. This isn't managed by the MMC/SDIO
subsystem, but the SDIO functional driver itself.
In brcmfmac we indeed support the out-of-band interrupt. That scnenario
is also taken care of in this patch. Thanks for the confirmation.
Regards,
Arend