Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 4 authors, 2021-02-10

Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT 0/2] W=1 by default for Ethernet PHY subsystem

From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-09-20 03:52:42
Also in: linux-kbuild

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 4:03 AM Andrew Lunn [off-list ref] wrote:
There is a movement to make the code base compile clean with W=1. Some
subsystems are already clean. In order to keep them clean, we need
developers to build new code with W=1 by default in these subsystems.

This patchset refactors the core Makefile warning code to allow the
additional warnings W=1 adds available to any Makefile. The Ethernet
PHY subsystem Makefiles then make use of this to make W=1 the default
for this subsystem.

RFT since i've only tested with x86 and arm with a modern gcc. Is the
code really clean for older compilers? For clang?

I appreciate your efforts for keeping your subsystems
clean for W=1 builds, and I hope this work will be
extended towards upper directory level,
drivers/net/phy -> drivers/net -> drivers/.


However, when we talk about W=1, we consider not only the current
option set in W=1, but also options that might be added
by future compilers because every GCC/Clang
release adds new warning options.



Let's say, the future release, GCC 14 would
add a new option -Wfoo-bar, which is
reasonable enough to be enabled by default,
but doing so would emit a lot of warnings
in the current kernel tree.

We cannot add -Wfoo-bar to W=0 right away,
because our general consensus is that
the normal build should be warning-free.


In the current routine, we add -Wfoo-bar to W=1
with hope we can gradually fix the code and
eventually migrate it to W=0.
It is not always easy to move W=1 options to W=0
when we have lots of code fixed.
At least, 0-day bot iterates compile tests with W=1,
so new code violating -Wfoo-bar would be blocked.


With this patch series applied, where should we
add -Wfoo-bar? Adding it to W=1 would emit warnings
under drivers/net/ since W=1 is now the default
for the net subsystem.

Do we require to fix the code under driver/net/ first?
Or, should we add it to W=2 temporarily, then move it to W=1
once we fix drivers/net/?



So, another idea might be hard-coding extra warnings
like drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile.

For example, your subsystem already achieved
-Wmissing-declarations free.

You can add

   subdir-ccflags-y += -Wmissing-declarations

to drivers/net/phy/Makefile.

Once you fix all net drivers, you can move it to
the parent, drivers/net/Makefile.

Then, drivers/Makefile next, and if it reaches
the top directory level, we can move it to W=0.



Some W=1 options stay there just because we cannot
fix lots of code.
So, our code should be improved with regard to W=1
warnings, but we might need some clarification
about how to do it gradually.

Comments are appreciated.






Andrew Lunn (2):
  scripts: Makefile.extrawarn: Add W=1 warnings to a symbol
  net: phylib: Enable W=1 by default

 drivers/net/mdio/Makefile  |  3 +++
 drivers/net/pcs/Makefile   |  3 +++
 drivers/net/phy/Makefile   |  3 +++
 scripts/Makefile.extrawarn | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--
2.28.0

--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help