Re: [PATCH] tipc: fix shutdown() of connectionless socket
From: Wouter Verhelst <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-03 15:13:03
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 08:57:01PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
On 2020/09/03 20:31, Wouter Verhelst wrote:quoted
So. On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 08:09:54PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:quoted
syzbot is reporting hung task at nbd_ioctl() [1], for there are two problems regarding TIPC's connectionless socket's shutdown() operation. I found C reproducer for this problem (shown below) from "no output from test machine (2)" report. ---------- int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { const int fd = open("/dev/nbd0", 3); ioctl(fd, NBD_SET_SOCK, socket(PF_TIPC, SOCK_DGRAM, 0));NBD expects a stream socket, not a datagram one.quoted
ioctl(fd, NBD_DO_IT, 0);This is supposed to sit and wait until someone disconnects the device again (which you probably cna't do with datagram sockets). Changing that changes a userspace API.Excuse me, but other datagram sockets (e.g. socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0)) does not hit this problem. What do you want to do? Add a "whether the file descriptor passed to ioctl(NBD_SET_SOCK) is a SOCK_STREAM socket" test to the NBD side?
I missed originally that you were checking whether the passed socket is in fact a SOCK_DGRAM socket, and limiting the changes to that. That's fine, because NBD doesn't deal with SOCK_DGRAM sockets anyway (i.e., passing a SOCK_DGRAM socket to the NBD device is undefined behavior). If the behavior also changes for SOCK_STREAM sockets then that would be a problem that would need to be reverted, but otherwise it's fine. -- To the thief who stole my anti-depressants: I hope you're happy -- seen somewhere on the Internet on a photo of a billboard