Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames for XDP
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden>
Date: 2020-08-20 07:47:23
Also in:
bpf
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:58:05 -0700 John Fastabend [off-list ref] wrote:
Jakub Kicinski wrote:quoted
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:22:23 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:quoted
quoted
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:13:51 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:quoted
Enable the capability to receive jumbo frames even if the interface is running in XDP mode Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>Hm, already? Is all the infra in place? Or does it not imply multi-buffer.with this series mvneta supports xdp multi-buff on both rx and tx sides (XDP_TX and ndo_xpd_xmit()) so we can remove MTU limitation.Is there an API for programs to access the multi-buf frames?Hi Lorenzo, This is not enough to support multi-buffer in my opinion. I have the same comment as Jakub. We need an API to pull in the multiple buffers otherwise we break the ability to parse the packets and that is a hard requirement to me. I don't want to lose visibility to get jumbo frames. At minimum we need a bpf_xdp_pull_data() to adjust pointer. In the skmsg case we use this, bpf_msg_pull_data(u32 start, u32 end, u64 flags) Where start is the offset into the packet and end is the last byte we want to adjust start/end pointers to. This way we can walk pages if we want and avoid having to linearize the data unless the user actual asks us for a block that crosses a page range. Smart users then never do a start/end that crosses a page boundary if possible. I think the same would apply here. XDP by default gives you the first page start/end to use freely. If you need to parse deeper into the payload then you call bpf_msg_pull_data with the byte offsets needed.
I agree that we need a helper like this. (I also think Daniel have proposed this before). This would also be useful for Eric Dumazet / Google's header-split use-case[1]. As I understood from his talk[1], the NIC HW might not always split the packet correctly (due to HW limits). This helper could solve part of this challenge. [1] https://netdevconf.info/0x14/session.html?talk-the-path-to-tcp-4k-mtu-and-rx-zerocopy -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer