Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 4 authors, 2020-08-26

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 28/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps

From: Roman Gushchin <hidden>
Date: 2020-08-21 23:15:51
Also in: bpf, linux-mm, lkml

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:23:21AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:01:32AM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
quoted
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
index 473665cac67e..49d1dcaf7999 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c
@@ -26,17 +26,12 @@ __u32 g_line = 0;
 		return 0;	\
 })
 
-struct bpf_map_memory {
-	__u32 pages;
-} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
-
 struct bpf_map {
 	enum bpf_map_type map_type;
 	__u32 key_size;
 	__u32 value_size;
 	__u32 max_entries;
 	__u32 id;
-	struct bpf_map_memory memory;
 } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
hmm. Did you build selftests?

progs/map_ptr_kern.c:45:14: error: no member named 'memory' in 'struct bpf_map'
        VERIFY(map->memory.pages > 0);
               ~~~  ^
progs/map_ptr_kern.c:25:8: note: expanded from macro 'VERIFY'
Oops, thanks, will fix in v5.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help