On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 08:57:19PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 3:10 PM Peilin Ye [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

do_ip_vs_set_ctl() is referencing uninitialized stack value when `len` is
zero. Fix it.

Which exact 'cmd' is it here?

I _guess_ it is one of those uninitialized in set_arglen[], which is 0.

Yes, it was `IP_VS_SO_SET_NONE`, implicitly initialized to zero.

But if that is the case, should it be initialized to
sizeof(struct ip_vs_service_user) instead because ip_vs_copy_usvc_compat()
is called anyway. Or, maybe we should just ban len==0 case.

I see. I think the latter would be easier, but we cannot ban all of
them, since the function does something with `IP_VS_SO_SET_FLUSH`, which
is a `len == 0` case.

Maybe we do something like this?

@@ -2432,6 +2432,8 @@ do_ip_vs_set_ctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, void __user *user, unsigned int len)

 	if (cmd < IP_VS_BASE_CTL || cmd > IP_VS_SO_SET_MAX)
 		return -EINVAL;
+	if (len == 0 && cmd != IP_VS_SO_SET_FLUSH)
+		return -EINVAL;
 	if (len != set_arglen[CMDID(cmd)]) {
 		IP_VS_DBG(1, "set_ctl: len %u != %u\n",
 			  len, set_arglen[CMDID(cmd)]);

@@ -2547,9 +2549,6 @@ do_ip_vs_set_ctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, void __user *user, unsigned int len)
 		break;
 	case IP_VS_SO_SET_DELDEST:
 		ret = ip_vs_del_dest(svc, &udest);
-		break;
-	default:
-		ret = -EINVAL;
 	}

   out_unlock:

Thank you,
Peilin Ye

In either case, it does not look like you fix it correctly.

Thanks.