Re: [DRAFT PATCH] random32: make prandom_u32() output unpredictable
From: Sedat Dilek <hidden>
Date: 2020-08-09 21:11:03
+ CC:netdev ( Just FYI: Build and boot on bare metal. ) - Sedat - On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 11:01 PM Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi George,
I have tried your patch on top of Linux v5.8 with...
commit f227e3ec3b5c ("random32: update the net random state on
interrupt and activity")
...reverted.
This was a bit tricky - what was your base?
Applied the typo fix from Randy - will a v2 follow?
Why DRAFT and not RFC?
Please drop the CC:stable - it's a DRAFT.
Other Linux stable like linux-5.7.y include...
commit c0842fbc1b18c7a044e6ff3e8fa78bfa822c7d1a
random32: move the pseudo-random 32-bit definitions to prandom.h
commit 585524081ecdcde1c719e63916c514866d898217
random: random.h should include archrandom.h, not the other way around
...linux-5.8.y stable will follow.
Isn't the move to prandom.h making your patch easier to apply?
In a second build I applied the snippet from Willy.
What do you mean by...?
[ quote ]
I wonder if, on general principles, it would be better to use a more
SipHash style mixing in of the sample:
m = get_cycles();
v3 ^= m;
SIPROUND(v0, v1, v2, v3);
SIPROUND(v0, v1, v2, v3);
v0 ^= m;
Not sure if it's worth the extra register (and associated spill/fill).
[ /quote ]
Have you a snippet for testing?
Thanks.
Regards,
- Sedat -