Re: [PATCH RFC leds + net-next v2 0/1] Add support for LEDs on Marvell PHYs
From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-24 10:29:07
Also in:
linux-leds, lkml
On Thu 2020-07-23 20:13:18, Marek Behún wrote:
Hi, this is v2 of my RFC adding support for LEDs connected to Marvell PHYs. The LED subsystem patches are not contained: - the patch adding support for LED private triggers is already accepted in Pavel Machek's for-next tree. If you want to try this patch on top of net-next, please also apply https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pavel/linux-leds.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=93690cdf3060c61dfce813121d0bfc055e7fa30d - the other led-trigger patch is not needed in this version of the RFC The main difference from v1 is that only one trigger, named "hw-control", is added to the /sys/class/leds/<LED>/trigger file. When this trigger is activated, another file called "hw_control" is created in the /sys/class/leds/<LED>/ directory. This file lists available HW control modes for this LED in the same way the trigger file does for triggers. Example: # cd /sys/class/leds/eth0\:green\:link/ # cat trigger [none] hw-control timer oneshot heartbeat ... # echo hw-control >trigger
Make this "hw-phy-mode" or something. hw-control is a bit too generic.
# cat trigger none [hw-control] timer oneshot heartbeat ... # cat hw_control link/nolink link/act/nolink 1000/100/10/nolink act/noact blink-act/noact transmit/notransmit copperlink/else [1000/else] force-hi-z force-blink # echo 1000/100/10/nolink >hw_control # cat hw_control link/nolink link/act/nolink [1000/100/10/nolink] act/noact blink-act/noact transmit/notransmit copperlink/else 1000/else force-hi-z force-blink The benefit here is that only one trigger is registered via LED API. I guess there are other PHY drivers which too support HW controlled blinking modes. So of this way of controlling PHY LED HW controlled modes is accepted, the code creating the hw-control trigger and hw_control file should be made into library code so that it can be reused. What do you think?
So.. you have 10 of them right now. I guess both hw_control and making it into the trigger directly is acceptable here. In future, would you expect having software "1000/100/10/nolink" triggers I could activate on my scrollock LED (or on GPIO controlled LEDs) to indicate network activity? Best regards, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 195 bytes