Re: Misaligned IPv6 addresses is SCTP socket options.
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-07-21 02:55:23
Also in:
linux-sctp
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 03:50:16PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
Several of the structures in linux/uapi/linux/sctp.h are marked __attribute__((packed, aligned(4))).
I don't think we can change that by now. It's bad, yes, but it's exposed and, well, for a long time (since 2005).
I believe this was done so that the UAPI structure was the same on both 32 and 64bit systems. The 'natural' alignment is that of 'u64' - so would differ between 32 and 64 bit x86 cpus. There are two horrible issues here: 1) I believe the natural alignment of u64 is actually 8 bytes on some 32bit architectures.
Not sure which?
So the change would have broken binary compatibility for 32bit applications compiled before the alignment was added.
If nobody complained in 15 years, that's probably not a problem. ;-)
2) Inside the kernel the address of the structure member is 'blindly' passed through as if it were an aligned pointer. For instance I'm pretty sure is can get passed to inet_addr_is_any() (in net/core/utils.). Here it gets passed to memcmp(). gcc will inline the memcmp() and almost certainly use 64bit accesses. These will fault on architectures (like sparc64).
For 2) here we should fix it by copying the data into a different buffer, or something like that. That is happening on structs sctp_setpeerprim sctp_prim sctp_paddrparams sctp_paddrinfo, right? As they all use the pattern of having a sockaddr_storage after a s32.
No amount of casting can make gcc 'forget' the alignment of a structure. Passing to an external function as 'void *' will - but even the LTO could track the alignment through. David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)