Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/5] bpf: Add support for XDP programs in DEVMAP entries
From: Andrii Nakryiko <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-01 22:52:20
Also in:
bpf
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 3:28 PM David Ahern [off-list ref] wrote:
On 6/1/20 3:12 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:quoted
In patch 5 I had to fix: /data/users/ast/net-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c: In function ‘test_neg_xdp_devmap_helpers’: /data/users/ast/net-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h:106:3: warning: ‘duration’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 106 | fprintf(stdout, "%s:PASS:%s %d nsec\n", \ | ^~~~~~~ /data/users/ast/net-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c:79:8: note: ‘duration’ was declared here 79 | __u32 duration;What compiler version? it compiles cleanly with ubuntu 20.04 and gcc 9.3. The other prog_tests are inconsistent with initializing it.
Do you have specific examples of inconsistencies? Seems like duration is: 1. either static variable, and thus zero-initialized; 2. is initialized explicitly at declaration; 3. is filled out with bpf_prog_test_run().
quoted
and that selftest is imo too primitive.I focused the selftests on API changes introduced by this set - new attach type, valid accesses to egress_ifindex and not allowing devmap programs with xdp generic.quoted
It's only loading progs and not executing them. Could you please add prog_test_run to it?I will look into it.