Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: ipa: head-of-line block registers are RX only
From: Alex Elder <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-30 01:01:26
Also in:
lkml
On 6/29/20 7:35 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:49:15 -0500 Alex Elder wrote:quoted
The INIT_HOL_BLOCK_EN and INIT_HOL_BLOCK_TIMER endpoint registers are only valid for RX endpoints. Have ipa_endpoint_modem_hol_block_clear_all() skip writing these registers for TX endpoints. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <redacted> --- drivers/net/ipa/ipa_endpoint.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ipa/ipa_endpoint.c b/drivers/net/ipa/ipa_endpoint.c index 9f50d0d11704..3f5a41fc1997 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ipa/ipa_endpoint.c +++ b/drivers/net/ipa/ipa_endpoint.c@@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ static int ipa_endpoint_init_hol_block_timer(struct ipa_endpoint *endpoint, u32 offset; u32 val; + /* assert(!endpoint->toward_ipa); */ + /* XXX We'll fix this when the register definition is clear */ if (microseconds) { struct device *dev = &ipa->pdev->dev;@@ -671,6 +673,8 @@ ipa_endpoint_init_hol_block_enable(struct ipa_endpoint *endpoint, bool enable) u32 offset; u32 val; + /* assert(!endpoint->toward_ipa); */What are these assert comments for? :S
They are place holders for when I can put in a proper assert function. For now I'm trying to avoid BUG_ON() calls, but at some point soon I'll replace these comments with calls to a macro that does BUG_ON() conditioned on a config option (or something else if there's a better suggestion). Even though it's commented, the assert() call does what I want, which is to communicate to the reader a condition assumed by the code, succinctly. -Alex