Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: add bpf_iter test with bpf_get_task_stack()
From: Yonghong Song <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-27 00:43:44
Also in:
bpf, lkml
On 6/26/20 5:26 PM, Song Liu wrote:
The new test is similar to other bpf_iter tests.
It would be great if you can show some results from bpf_iter_task_stack.c dump.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <redacted> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 17 ++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_stack.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_stack.cdiff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c index 1e2e0fced6e81..fed42755416db 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ #include "bpf_iter_netlink.skel.h" #include "bpf_iter_bpf_map.skel.h" #include "bpf_iter_task.skel.h" +#include "bpf_iter_task_stack.skel.h" #include "bpf_iter_task_file.skel.h" #include "bpf_iter_tcp4.skel.h" #include "bpf_iter_tcp6.skel.h"@@ -110,6 +111,20 @@ static void test_task(void) bpf_iter_task__destroy(skel); } +static void test_task_stack(void) +{ + struct bpf_iter_task_stack *skel; + + skel = bpf_iter_task_stack__open_and_load(); + if (CHECK(!skel, "bpf_iter_task_stack__open_and_load", + "skeleton open_and_load failed\n")) + return; + + do_dummy_read(skel->progs.dump_task_stack); + + bpf_iter_task_stack__destroy(skel); +} + static void test_task_file(void) { struct bpf_iter_task_file *skel;@@ -452,6 +467,8 @@ void test_bpf_iter(void) test_bpf_map(); if (test__start_subtest("task")) test_task(); + if (test__start_subtest("task_stack")) + test_task_stack(); if (test__start_subtest("task_file")) test_task_file(); if (test__start_subtest("tcp4"))diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_stack.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..39b21df17c3ee --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_stack.c@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */ +/* "undefine" structs in vmlinux.h, because we "override" them below */ +#define bpf_iter_meta bpf_iter_meta___not_used +#define bpf_iter__task bpf_iter__task___not_used +#include "vmlinux.h" +#undef bpf_iter_meta +#undef bpf_iter__task +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h> + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; + +struct bpf_iter_meta { + struct seq_file *seq; + __u64 session_id; + __u64 seq_num; +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); + +struct bpf_iter__task { + struct bpf_iter_meta *meta; + struct task_struct *task; +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
Please take a look at bpf_iter_task.c. The above code can be simplified as #include "bpf_iter.h" #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH 64
+unsigned long entries[MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH];
+#define SIZE_OF_ULONG (sizeof(unsigned long))
+
+SEC("iter/task")
+int dump_task_stack(struct bpf_iter__task *ctx)
+{
+ struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq;
+ struct task_struct *task = ctx->task;
+ long i, retlen;
+
+ if (task == (void *)0)
+ return 0;
+
+ retlen = bpf_get_task_stack(task, entries,
+ MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH * SIZE_OF_ULONG, 0);
+ if (retlen < 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "pid: %8u num_entries: %8u\n", task->pid,
+ retlen / SIZE_OF_ULONG);
+ for (i = 0; i < MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH; i++) {
+ if (retlen > i * SIZE_OF_ULONG)
+ BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "[<0>] %pB\n", (void *)entries[i]);
+ }
+ BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "\n");
+
+ return 0;
+}