Thread (36 messages) 36 messages, 4 authors, 2020-06-09

Re: [PATCH 5/6] vdpa: introduce virtio pci driver

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2020-06-02 05:08:14
Also in: kvm, lkml, virtualization

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 04:03:02PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
+static void vp_vdpa_set_vq_ready(struct vdpa_device *vdpa,
+				 u16 qid, bool ready)
+{
+	struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa = vdpa_to_vp(vdpa);
+
+	vp_iowrite16(qid, &vp_vdpa->common->queue_select);
+	vp_iowrite16(ready, &vp_vdpa->common->queue_enable);
+}
+
Looks like this needs to check and just skip the write if
ready == 0, right? Of course vdpa core then insists on calling
vp_vdpa_get_vq_ready which will warn. Maybe just drop the
check from core, move it to drivers which need it?

...

+static const struct pci_device_id vp_vdpa_id_table[] = {
+	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT_QUMRANET, PCI_ANY_ID) },
+	{ 0 }
+};
This looks like it'll create a mess with either virtio pci
or vdpa being loaded at random. Maybe just don't specify
any IDs for now. Down the road we could get a
distinct vendor ID or a range of device IDs for this.
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, vp_vdpa_id_table);
+
+static struct pci_driver vp_vdpa_driver = {
+	.name		= "vp-vdpa",
+	.id_table	= vp_vdpa_id_table,
+	.probe		= vp_vdpa_probe,
+	.remove		= vp_vdpa_remove,
+};
+
+module_pci_driver(vp_vdpa_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Jason Wang [off-list ref]");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("vp-vdpa");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_VERSION("1");
-- 
2.20.1
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help