Thread (38 messages) 38 messages, 7 authors, 2020-07-20

Re: [PATCH v1 01/25] net: core: device_rename: Use rwsem instead of a seqcount

From: Ahmed S. Darwish <hidden>
Date: 2020-05-20 06:43:14
Also in: lkml

Hello Eric,

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 07:01:38PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On 5/19/20 2:45 PM, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
quoted
Sequence counters write paths are critical sections that must never be
preempted, and blocking, even for CONFIG_PREEMPTION=n, is not allowed.

Commit 5dbe7c178d3f ("net: fix kernel deadlock with interface rename and
netdev name retrieval.") handled a deadlock, observed with
CONFIG_PREEMPTION=n, where the devnet_rename seqcount read side was
infinitely spinning: it got scheduled after the seqcount write side
blocked inside its own critical section.

To fix that deadlock, among other issues, the commit added a
cond_resched() inside the read side section. While this will get the
non-preemptible kernel eventually unstuck, the seqcount reader is fully
exhausting its slice just spinning -- until TIF_NEED_RESCHED is set.

The fix is also still broken: if the seqcount reader belongs to a
real-time scheduling policy, it can spin forever and the kernel will
livelock.

Disabling preemption over the seqcount write side critical section will
not work: inside it are a number of GFP_KERNEL allocations and mutex
locking through the drivers/base/ :: device_rename() call chain.

From all the above, replace the seqcount with a rwsem.

Fixes: 5dbe7c178d3f (net: fix kernel deadlock with interface rename and netdev name retrieval.)
Fixes: 30e6c9fa93cf (net: devnet_rename_seq should be a seqcount)
Fixes: c91f6df2db49 (sockopt: Change getsockopt() of SO_BINDTODEVICE to return an interface name)
Cc: <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Seems fine to me, assuming rwsem prevent starvation of the writer.
Thanks for the review.

AFAIK, due to 5cfd92e12e13 ("locking/rwsem: Adaptive disabling of reader
optimistic spinning"), using a rwsem shouldn't lead to writer starvation
in the contended case.

--
Ahmed S. Darwish
Linutronix GmbH
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help