Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2020-05-25

Re: [PATCH] sctp: check assoc before SCTP_ADDR_{MADE_PRIM,ADDED} event

From: Jonas Falkevik <hidden>
Date: 2020-05-15 08:30:43
Also in: linux-sctp, lkml

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:32 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:11:05PM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
quoted
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:01 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:52:16PM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
quoted
Do not generate SCTP_ADDR_{MADE_PRIM,ADDED} events for SCTP_FUTURE_ASSOC assocs.
How did you get them?
I think one case is when receiving INIT chunk in sctp_sf_do_5_1B_init().
Here a closed association is created, sctp_make_temp_assoc().
Which is later used when calling sctp_process_init().
In sctp_process_init() one of the first things are to call
sctp_assoc_add_peer()
on the closed / temp assoc.

sctp_assoc_add_peer() are generating the SCTP_ADDR_ADDED event on the socket
for the potentially new association.
I see, thanks. The SCTP_FUTURE_ASSOC means something different. It is
for setting/getting socket options that will be used for new asocs. In
this case, it is just a coincidence that asoc_id is not set (but
initialized to 0) and SCTP_FUTURE_ASSOC is also 0.
yes, you are right, I overlooked that.
Moreso, if I didn't
miss anything, it would block valid events, such as those from
 sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce
   sctp_process_init
because sctp_process_init will only call sctp_assoc_set_id() by its
end.
Do we want these events at this stage?
Since the association is a newly established one, have the peer address changed?
Should we enqueue these messages with sm commands instead?
And drop them if we don't have state SCTP_STATE_ESTABLISHED?
I can't see a good reason for generating any event on temp assocs. So
I'm thinking the checks on this patch should be on whether the asoc is
a temporary one instead. WDYT?
Agree, we shouldn't rely on coincidence.
Either check temp instead or the above mentioned state?
Then, considering the socket is locked, both code points should be
allocating the IDR earlier. It's expensive, yes (point being, it could
be avoided in case of other failures), but it should be generating
events with the right assoc id. Are you interested in pursuing this
fix as well?
Sure.

If we check temp status instead, we would need to allocate IDR earlier,
as you mention. So that we send the notification with correct assoc id.

But shouldn't the SCTP_COMM_UP, for a newly established association, be the
first notification event sent?
The SCTP_COMM_UP notification is enqueued later in sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce().

quoted
$ cat sctp.bpftrace
#!/usr/local/bin/bpftrace

BEGIN
{
   printf("Tracing sctp_assoc_add_peer\n");
   printf("Hit Ctrl-C to end.\n");
}

kprobe:sctp_assoc_add_peer
{
   @[kstack]=count();
}

$ sudo bpftrace sctp.bpftrace
Attaching 2 probes...
Tracing sctp_assoc_add_peer
Hit Ctrl-C to end.
^C

@[
   sctp_assoc_add_peer+1
   sctp_process_init+77
   sctp_sf_do_5_1B_init+615
   sctp_do_sm+132
   sctp_endpoint_bh_rcv+256
   sctp_rcv+2379
   ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+393
   ip_local_deliver_finish+68
   ip_local_deliver+203
   ip_rcv+156
   __netif_receive_skb_one_core+96
   process_backlog+164
   net_rx_action+312
   __softirqentry_text_start+238
   do_softirq_own_stack+42
   do_softirq.part.0+65
   __local_bh_enable_ip+75
   ip_finish_output2+415
   ip_output+102
   __ip_queue_xmit+364
   sctp_packet_transmit+1814
   sctp_outq_flush_ctrl.constprop.0+394
   sctp_outq_flush+86
   sctp_do_sm+3914
   sctp_primitive_ASSOCIATE+44
   __sctp_connect+707
   sctp_inet_connect+98
   __sys_connect+156
   __x64_sys_connect+22
   do_syscall_64+91
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+68
]: 1
...
quoted
I'm thinking you're fixing a side-effect of another issue here. For
example, in sctp_assoc_update(), it first calls sctp_assoc_add_peer()
to only then call sctp_assoc_set_id(), which would generate the event
you might have seen. In this case, it should be allocating IDR before,
so that the event can be sent with the right assoc_id already.
quoted
These events are described in rfc6458#section-6.1
SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE:
This tag indicates that an address that is
part of an existing association has experienced a change of
state (e.g., a failure or return to service of the reachability
of an endpoint via a specific transport address).

Signed-off-by: Jonas Falkevik <redacted>
---
 net/sctp/associola.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
index 437079a4883d..0c5dd295f9b8 100644
--- a/net/sctp/associola.c
+++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
@@ -432,8 +432,10 @@ void sctp_assoc_set_primary(struct sctp_association *asoc,
         changeover = 1 ;

     asoc->peer.primary_path = transport;
-    sctp_ulpevent_nofity_peer_addr_change(transport,
-                          SCTP_ADDR_MADE_PRIM, 0);
+    if (sctp_assoc2id(asoc) != SCTP_FUTURE_ASSOC)
+        sctp_ulpevent_nofity_peer_addr_change(transport,
+                              SCTP_ADDR_MADE_PRIM,
+                              0);

     /* Set a default msg_name for events. */
     memcpy(&asoc->peer.primary_addr, &transport->ipaddr,
@@ -714,7 +716,10 @@ struct sctp_transport *sctp_assoc_add_peer(struct
sctp_association *asoc,
     list_add_tail_rcu(&peer->transports, &asoc->peer.transport_addr_list);
     asoc->peer.transport_count++;

-    sctp_ulpevent_nofity_peer_addr_change(peer, SCTP_ADDR_ADDED, 0);
+    if (sctp_assoc2id(asoc) != SCTP_FUTURE_ASSOC)
+        sctp_ulpevent_nofity_peer_addr_change(peer,
+                              SCTP_ADDR_ADDED,
+                              0);

     /* If we do not yet have a primary path, set one.  */
     if (!asoc->peer.primary_path) {
--
2.25.3
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help