I'm curious if I could still modify these commit message information for the v1 patch,
which has already been applied and queued up?
The maintainer found the provided information good enough.
Thus he committed the software correction with the subject
“nfp: abm: fix a memory leak bug” on 2020-05-04.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/abm/main.c?id=bd4af432cc71b5fbfe4833510359a6ad3ada250d
So this change will probably be published “forever” since then.
I got the impression that the corresponding patch review contains helpful information.
I am curious then if it might affect the adjustment of related patches.
quoted
Will such considerations become relevant for any subsequent
software development approaches?
Sorry, I actually don't familiar with these.
I am informed in the way that you can participate in university research groups.
Thus I assumed that you would like to add recent insights
from computer science areas.
I imagined that the bug report (combined with a patch) was triggered by
an evolving source code analysis approach which will be explained
in another research paper. Is such a view appropriate?
https://github.com/umnsec/cheq/
Regards,
Markus