Re: [bpf-next PATCH 04/10] bpf: verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-03-26 15:18:21
Also in:
bpf
Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:38:56AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:quoted
-static void __reg_bound_offset32(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +static void __reg_combine_32_into_64(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { - u64 mask = 0xffffFFFF; - struct tnum range = tnum_range(reg->umin_value & mask, - reg->umax_value & mask); - struct tnum lo32 = tnum_cast(reg->var_off, 4); - struct tnum hi32 = tnum_lshift(tnum_rshift(reg->var_off, 32), 32); + /* special case when 64-bit register has upper 32-bit register + * zeroed. Typically happens after zext or <<32, >>32 sequence + * allowing us to use 32-bit bounds directly, + */ + if (tnum_equals_const(tnum_clear_subreg(reg->var_off), 0)) { + reg->umin_value = reg->u32_min_value; + reg->umax_value = reg->u32_max_value; + reg->smin_value = reg->s32_min_value; + reg->smax_value = reg->s32_max_value;Looks like above will not be correct for negative s32_min/max. When upper 32-bit are cleared and we're processing jmp32 we cannot set smax_value to s32_max_value. Consider if (w0 s< -5) s32_max_value == -5 which is 0xfffffffb but upper 32 are zeros so smax_value should be (u64)0xfffffffb and not (s64)-5
Right, good catch. I'll use below logic here as well.
We can be fancy and precise with this logic, but I would just use similar approach from zext_32_to_64() where the following: + if (reg->s32_min_value > 0) + reg->smin_value = reg->s32_min_value; + else + reg->smin_value = 0; + if (reg->s32_max_value > 0) + reg->smax_value = reg->s32_max_value; + else + reg->smax_value = U32_MAX; should work for this case too ?quoted
+ if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) { + pred = is_branch_taken(dst_reg, insn->imm, opcode, is_jmp32); + } else if (src_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && is_jmp32 && tnum_is_const(tnum_subreg(src_reg->var_off))) { + pred = is_branch_taken(dst_reg, tnum_subreg(src_reg->var_off).value, opcode, is_jmp32); + } else if (src_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && !is_jmp32 && tnum_is_const(src_reg->var_off)) { + pred = is_branch_taken(dst_reg, src_reg->var_off.value, opcode, is_jmp32); + }pls wrap these lines. Way above normal.
+1
The rest is awesome.
Thanks.