Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5] bpf: Support llvm-objcopy and llvm-objdump for vmlinux BTF
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2020-03-17 23:44:57
Also in:
bpf
On 3/18/20 12:14 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:13 PM Stanislav Fomichev [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:08 PM Nick Desaulniers [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:01 PM Fangrui Song [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 2020-03-17, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:quoted
Please keep small changelog here, for example: v5: * rebased on top of bpfnextThanks for the tip. Add them at the bottom?"Below the fold" see this patch I just sent out: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200317215515.226917-1-ndesaulniers@google.com/T/#u (local) grep "Changes" $ git format-patch -v2 HEAD~ $ vim 0001-...patch <manually add changelog "below the fold">BPF subtree prefers the changelog in the commit body, not the comments (iow, before ---). Add them at the end of you message, see, for example: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/a428fb88-9b53-27dd-a195-497755944921@iogearbox.net/T/ (local)Sigh, every maintainer is a special snowflake. In our tree, you're only allowed to commit on Thursdays under a blood moon. /s But thanks for the note.
For every commit into bpf/bpf-next we automatically put a 'Link:' tag pointing to the lore.kernel.org/bpf long-term archive, so there is always an easy way to retrieve additional information or discussions ([0] as one example). So whether you put it above or below the '---' line I personally don't mind either way. All crucial information that helps a reader later on to understand /why/ we ended up exactly with the current change should be part of the main commit log though. [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=483d7a30f538e2f8addd32aa9a3d2e94ae55fa65