Re: [PATCH v2] net: memcg: late association of sock to memcg
From: Shakeel Butt <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-05 04:54:48
Also in:
cgroups, linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 8:38 PM Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 6:19 PM Shakeel Butt [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 5:36 PM Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 3:39 PM Shakeel Butt [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
If a TCP socket is allocated in IRQ context or cloned from unassociated (i.e. not associated to a memcg) in IRQ context then it will remain unassociated for its whole life. Almost half of the TCPs created on the system are created in IRQ context, so, memory used by such sockets will not be accounted by the memcg. This issue is more widespread in cgroup v1 where network memory accounting is opt-in but it can happen in cgroup v2 if the source socket for the cloning was created in root memcg. To fix the issue, just do the late association of the unassociated sockets at accept() time in the process context and then force charge the memory buffer already reserved by the socket. Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <redacted> --- Changes since v1: - added sk->sk_rmem_alloc to initial charging. - added synchronization to get memory usage and set sk_memcg race-free. net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c index a4db79b1b643..7bcd657cd45e 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c@@ -482,6 +482,25 @@ struct sock *inet_csk_accept(struct sock *sk, int flags, int *err, bool kern) } spin_unlock_bh(&queue->fastopenq.lock); } + + if (mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled && !newsk->sk_memcg) { + int amt; + + /* atomically get the memory usage and set sk->sk_memcg. */ + lock_sock(newsk); + + /* The sk has not been accepted yet, no need to look at + * sk->sk_wmem_queued. + */ + amt = sk_mem_pages(newsk->sk_forward_alloc + + atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)); + mem_cgroup_sk_alloc(newsk); + + release_sock(newsk); + + if (newsk->sk_memcg)Most sockets in accept queue should have amt == 0, so maybe avoid calling this thing only when amt == 0 ?Thanks, will do in the next version. BTW I have tested with adding mdelay() here and running iperf3 and I did see non-zero amt.quoted
Also I would release_sock(newsk) after this, otherwise incoming packets could mess with newsk->sk_forward_allocI think that is fine. Once sk->sk_memcg is set then mem_cgroup_charge_skmem() will be called for new incoming packets. Here we just need to call mem_cgroup_charge_skmem() with amt before sk->sk_memcg was set.Unfortunately, as soon as release_sock(newsk) is done, incoming packets can be fed to the socket, and completely change memory usage of the socket. For example, the whole queue might have been zapped, or collapsed, if we receive a RST packet, or if memory pressure asks us to prune the out of order queue. So you might charge something, then never uncharge it, since at close() time the socket will have zero bytes to uncharge.
Ok, thanks for the explanation. I will fix this in the next version.