Thread (22 messages) flat view 22 messages, 3 authors, 2020-03-27

Re: [PATCH V2 08/14] net: ks8851: Use 16-bit writes to program MAC address

From: Michal Kubecek <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-25 16:56:46

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:05:37PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On the SPI variant of KS8851, the MAC address can be programmed with
either 8/16/32-bit writes. To make it easier to support the 16-bit
parallel option of KS8851 too, switch both the MAC address programming
and readout to 16-bit operations.

Remove ks8851_wrreg8() as it is not used anywhere anymore.

There should be no functional change.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Petr Stetiar <redacted>
Cc: YueHaibing <redacted>
---
V2: Get rid of the KS_MAR(i + 1) by adjusting KS_MAR(x) macro
---
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -358,8 +329,12 @@ static int ks8851_write_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev)
 	 * the first write to the MAC address does not take effect.
 	 */
 	ks8851_set_powermode(ks, PMECR_PM_NORMAL);
-	for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++)
-		ks8851_wrreg8(ks, KS_MAR(i), dev->dev_addr[i]);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i += 2) {
+		val = (dev->dev_addr[i] << 8) | dev->dev_addr[i + 1];
+		ks8851_wrreg16(ks, KS_MAR(i), val);
+	}
+
 	if (!netif_running(dev))
 		ks8851_set_powermode(ks, PMECR_PM_SOFTDOWN);
 
@@ -377,12 +352,16 @@ static int ks8851_write_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev)
 static void ks8851_read_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	struct ks8851_net *ks = netdev_priv(dev);
+	u16 reg;
 	int i;
 
 	mutex_lock(&ks->lock);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++)
-		dev->dev_addr[i] = ks8851_rdreg8(ks, KS_MAR(i));
+	for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i += 2) {
+		reg = ks8851_rdreg16(ks, KS_MAR(i));
+		dev->dev_addr[i] = reg & 0xff;
+		dev->dev_addr[i + 1] = reg >> 8;
+	}
 
 	mutex_unlock(&ks->lock);
 }
It seems my question from v1 went unnoticed and the inconsistency still
seems to be there so let me ask again: when writing, you put addr[i]
into upper part of the 16-bit value and addr[i+1] into lower but when 
reading, you do the opposite. Is it correct?

Michal Kubecek
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help