Re: [PATCH bpf 3/3] selftests/bpf: Test freeing sockmap/sockhash with a socket in it
From: Yonghong Song <hidden>
Date: 2020-02-09 04:13:13
Also in:
bpf
On 2/8/20 6:41 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:28 AM Jakub Sitnicki [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Commit 7e81a3530206 ("bpf: Sockmap, ensure sock lock held during tear down") introduced sleeping issues inside RCU critical sections and while holding a spinlock on sockmap/sockhash tear-down. There has to be at least one socket in the map for the problem to surface. This adds a test that triggers the warnings for broken locking rules. Not a fix per se, but rather tooling to verify the accompanying fixes. Run on a VM with 1 vCPU to reproduce the warnings. Fixes: 7e81a3530206 ("bpf: Sockmap, ensure sock lock held during tear down") Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>selftests/bpf no longer builds for me. make BINARY test_maps TEST-OBJ [test_progs] sockmap_basic.test.o /data/users/ast/net/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c: In function ‘connected_socket_v4’: /data/users/ast/net/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c:20:11: error: ‘TCP_REPAIR_ON’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘TCP_REPAIR’? 20 | repair = TCP_REPAIR_ON; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ | TCP_REPAIR /data/users/ast/net/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c:20:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in /data/users/ast/net/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c:29:11: error: ‘TCP_REPAIR_OFF_NO_WP’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS’? 29 | repair = TCP_REPAIR_OFF_NO_WP; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS Clearly /usr/include/linux/tcp.h is too old. Suggestions?
In the past, when such situation happens, people typically sync to linux/tools/include/uapi/ directory. This probably will work in this case as well.