On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:54:46PM +0100, Dominique Martinet wrote:
quoted
[...]
+ if (n != count) {
+ *err = -EFAULT;
+ p9_tag_remove(clnt, req);
+ return n;
}
- p9_tag_remove(clnt, req);
+ } else {
+ iov_iter_advance(to, count);
+ count;
Any reason for this stray 'count;' statement?
If you're ok with this I'll just take patch without that line, don't
bother resubmitting.
No reason, i've just accidentally left it.
Will take a fair amount of time to make it to linux-next though, test
setup needs some love and I want to run tests even if this should be
straightforward...
Thanks!
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
/\ http://arc.pasp.de/ - against proprietary attachments