[PATCH net 0/4] rxrpc: Fixes ver #2 · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2020-02-03
[PATCH net 1/4] rxrpc: Fix use-after-free in rxrpc_put_local() ver #2 · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2020-02-03
[PATCH net 2/4] rxrpc: Fix insufficient receive notification generation ver #2 · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2020-02-03
[PATCH net 3/4] rxrpc: Fix missing active use pinning of rxrpc_local object ver #2 · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2020-02-03
[PATCH net 4/4] rxrpc: Fix NULL pointer deref due to call->conn being cleared on disconnect ver #2 · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2020-02-03
Re: [PATCH net 0/4] rxrpc: Fixes ver #2 · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2020-02-03
Re: [PATCH net 0/4] rxrpc: Fixes ver #2 · David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> · 2020-02-03
Re: [PATCH net 0/4] rxrpc: Fixes ver #2 · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2020-02-03

Re: [PATCH net 0/4] rxrpc: Fixes ver #2

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2020-02-03 19:39:03
Also in: lkml

Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:

I pulled rxrpc-fixes-20200202 since that tag seems to correspond to 
the patches on the mailing list.

Sorry, yes - I forgot to change that.

Should I queue these for stable? There are some fixes to fixes here, 
so AFAIK we need:

5273a191dca65a675dc0bcf3909e59c6933e2831   4.9+
04d36d748fac349b068ef621611f454010054c58   4.19+
f71dbf2fb28489a79bde0dca1c8adfb9cdb20a6b   4.9+
fac20b9e738523fc884ee3ea5be360a321cd8bad   4.19+

Yes, please.  DaveM asked me not to put stable tags in my net patches, IIRC,
as his scripts do that automagically.

David

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help