From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Date: Thu,  6 Feb 2020 13:46:05 -0800

 ...

One bit that might need some attention is the fix for not dropping all
packets when taprio and ETF offloading are used, patch 5/5. The
behavior when the fix is applied is that packets that have a 'txtime'
that would fall outside of their transmission window are now dropped
by taprio. The question that might be raised is: should taprio be
responsible for dropping these packets, or should it be handled lower
in the stack?

My opinion is: taprio has all the information, and it's able to give
feeback to the user. Lower in the stack, those packets might go into
the void, and the only feedback could be a hard to find counter
increasing.

Patch 1/5: Reported by Po Liu, is more of a improvement of usability for
drivers implementing offloading features, now they can rely on the
value of dev->num_tc, instead of going through some hops to get this
value.

Patch 2/5: Use 'q->flags' as the source of truth for the offloading
flags. Tries to solidify the current behavior, while avoiding going
into invalid states, one of which was causing a "rcu stall" (more
information in the commit message).

Patch 3/5: Adds the missing netlink attribute validation for
TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS.

Patch 4/5: Replaces the usage of netdev_set_num_tc() with
netdev_reset_tc() in taprio_destroy(), taprio_destroy() is called when
applying a configuration fails, making sure that the device traffic
class configuration goes back to the default state.

 ....

Series applied, thank you.