Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/3] bpf: Program extensions or dynamic re-linking
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-22 10:45:13
Also in:
bpf
Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 04:37:31PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:quoted
Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] writes:quoted
The last few month BPF community has been discussing an approach to call chaining, since exiting bpt_tail_call() mechanism used in production XDP programs has plenty of downsides. The outcome of these discussion was a conclusion to implement dynamic re-linking of BPF programs. Where rootlet XDP program attached to a netdevice can programmatically define a policy of execution of other XDP programs. Such rootlet would be compiled as normal XDP program and provide a number of placeholder global functions which later can be replaced with future XDP programs. BPF trampoline, function by function verification were building blocks towards that goal. The patch 1 is a final building block. It introduces dynamic program extensions. A number of improvements like more flexible function by function verification and better libbpf api will be implemented in future patches.This is great, thank you! I'll go play around with it; couldn't spot anything obvious from eye-balling the code, except that yeah, it does need a more flexible libbpf api :) One thing that's not obvious to me: How can userspace tell which programs replace which functions after they are loaded? Is this put into prog_tags in struct bpf_prog_info, or?good point. Would be good to extend bpf_prog_info. Since prog-to-prog connection is unidirectional the bpf_prog_info of extension prog will be able to say which original program it's replacing.
Yeah, that'll do. I can live with having to enumerate all programs and backtrack to the attached XDP program to figure out its component parts.
bpftool prog show will be able to print all this data. I think fenry/fexit progs would need the same bpf_prog_info extension. attach_prog_id + attach_btf_id would be enough.
Yes, please. I actually assumed this was already there for fentry/fexit, which is why I was puzzled I couldn't find where this series hooked into that. I'll just wait for such an extension to show up, then :)
In the mean time I can try to hack drgn script to do the same.
That would be great, thanks! -Toke