Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2020-01-20

Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: don't check for btf fd in test_btf

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2020-01-20 22:16:21
Also in: bpf

On 1/18/20 2:05 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
After commit 0d13bfce023a ("libbpf: Don't require root for
bpf_object__open()") we no longer load BTF during bpf_object__open(),
so let's remove the expectation from test_btf that the fd is not -1.
The test currently fails.

Before:
BTF libbpf test[1] (test_btf_haskv.o): do_test_file:4152:FAIL bpf_object__btf_fd: -1
BTF libbpf test[2] (test_btf_newkv.o): do_test_file:4152:FAIL bpf_object__btf_fd: -1
BTF libbpf test[3] (test_btf_nokv.o): do_test_file:4152:FAIL bpf_object__btf_fd: -1

After:
BTF libbpf test[1] (test_btf_haskv.o): OK
BTF libbpf test[2] (test_btf_newkv.o): OK
BTF libbpf test[3] (test_btf_nokv.o): OK

Fixes: 0d13bfce023a ("libbpf: Don't require root forbpf_object__open()")
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <redacted>
Applied, thanks!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help