Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 7 authors, 2020-01-15

Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] bpf: Introduce function-by-function verification

From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-09 23:03:35
Also in: bpf

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 09:57:50AM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
quoted
As far as future plans when libbpf sees FUNC_EXTERN it will do the linking the
way we discussed in the other thread. The kernel will support FUNC_EXTERN when
we introduce dynamic libraries. A collection of bpf functions will be loaded
into the kernel first (like libc.so) and later programs will have FUNC_EXTERN
as part of their BTF to be resolved while loading. The func name to btf_id
resolution will be done by libbpf. The kernel verifier will do the type
checking on BTFs.
Right, FUNC_EXTERN will be rejected by the kernel unless it's patched up
with "target" btf_ids by libbpf before load? So it'll be
FUNC_GLOBAL-linked functions that will be replaceable after the fact
with the "dynamic re-linking" feature?
Right. When libbpf statically links two .o it will need to produce a combined
BTF out of these two .o. That new BTF will not have FUNC_EXTERN anymore if they
are resolved. When the kernel sees FUNC_EXTERN it's a directive for the kernel
to resolve it. BPF program with FUNC_EXTERN references would be loadable, but
not executable. Anyhow the extern work is not immediate. I don't think any of
that is necessary for dynamic re-linking.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help