Marc,
On 23/01/20 4:47 pm, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 1/22/20 9:03 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
quoted
This series adds driver patches to support MCAN in TI's AM654x-idk.
Faiz Abbas (3):
dt-bindings: net: can: m_can: Add Documentation for stb-gpios
can: m_can: m_can_platform: Add support for enabling transceiver
through the STB line
arm64: defconfig: Add Support for Bosch M_CAN controllers
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt | 2 ++
arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 +++
drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c | 12 ++++++++++++
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
What about adding support for xceiver-supply as done in several other
drivers (ti_hecc.c, flexcan.c, mcp251x.c)? And using this for the stb line?
Looks like you had given this feedback a long time ago and I forgot
about it. Sorry about that :-)
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1006238/
But now that I think about it, its kinda weird that we are modelling
part of the transceiver as a separate child node
(Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/can-transceiver.txt) and the
other parts as a regulator.
Anyone looking at the transceiver node would figure thats where the
enable gpio/regulator node needs to go instead of the parent node.
Shouldn't we have all transceiver properties under the same node?
Thanks,
Faiz