Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2019-12-10

Re: [PATCH 8/8] arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: enable wifi module at sdio0

From: Kalle Valo <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-10 09:15:02
Also in: linux-rockchip, linux-wireless, lkml

Heiko Stübner [off-list ref] writes:
Hi Soeren,

Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2019, 00:29:21 CET schrieb Soeren Moch:
quoted
On 10.12.19 00:08, Heiko Stübner wrote:
quoted
Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2019, 23:38:22 CET schrieb Soeren Moch:
quoted
RockPro64 supports an Ampak AP6359SA based wifi/bt combo module.
The BCM4359/9 wifi controller in this module is connected to sdio0,
enable this interface.

Signed-off-by: Soeren Moch <redacted>
---
Not sure where to place exactly the sdio0 node in the dts because
existing sd nodes are not sorted alphabetically.

This last patch in this brcmfmac patch series probably should be picked
up by Heiko independently of the rest of this series. It was sent together
to show how this brcmfmac extension for 4359-sdio support with RSDB is
used and tested.
node placement looks good so I can apply it, just a general questions
I only got patch 8/8 are patches 1-7 relevant for this one and what are they?
Patches 1-7 are the patches to support the BCM4359 chipset with SDIO
interface in the linux brcmfmac net-wireless driver, see [1].

So this patch series has 2 parts:
patches 1-7: add support for the wifi chipset in the wireless driver,
this has to go through net-wireless
patch 8: enable the wifi module with this chipset on RockPro64, this patch
Thanks for the clarification :-) .

As patch 8 "only" does the core sdio node, it doesn't really depend on the
earlier ones and you can submit any uart-hooks for bluetooth once the
other patches land I guess.

quoted
If this was confusing, what would be the ideal way to post such series?
I think every maintainer has some slightly different perspective on this,
but personally I like getting the whole series to follow the discussion but
also to just see when the driver-side changes get merged, as the dts-parts
need to wait for that in a lot of cases.
FWIW I prefer the same as Heiko. If I don't see all the patches in the
patchset I start worrying if patchwork lost them, or something, and then
it takes more time from me to investigate what happened. So I strongly
recommend sending the whole series to everyone as it saves time.

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help