Re: [PATCH v3] net/tls: Fix return values to avoid ENOTSUPP
flat view
From: Jakub Kicinski <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-05 19:34:26
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 07:41:18 +0100, Valentin Vidic wrote:
ENOTSUPP is not available in userspace, for example: setsockopt failed, 524, Unknown error 524 Signed-off-by: Valentin Vidic <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_device.c b/net/tls/tls_device.c index 0683788bbef0..cd91ad812291 100644 --- a/net/tls/tls_device.c +++ b/net/tls/tls_device.c@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static int tls_push_data(struct sock *sk, if (flags & ~(MSG_MORE | MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL | MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST)) - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -EOPNOTSUPP; if (unlikely(sk->sk_err)) return -sk->sk_err;@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ int tls_device_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page *page, lock_sock(sk); if (flags & MSG_OOB) { - rc = -ENOTSUPP; + rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
Perhaps the flag checks should return EINVAL? Willem any opinions?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
goto out; }@@ -1023,7 +1023,7 @@ int tls_set_device_offload(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *ctx) } if (!(netdev->features & NETIF_F_HW_TLS_TX)) { - rc = -ENOTSUPP; + rc = -EOPNOTSUPP; goto release_netdev; }@@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ int tls_set_device_offload_rx(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *ctx) } if (!(netdev->features & NETIF_F_HW_TLS_RX)) { - rc = -ENOTSUPP; + rc = -EOPNOTSUPP; goto release_netdev; }diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c index bdca31ffe6da..5830b8e02a36 100644 --- a/net/tls/tls_main.c +++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int do_tls_setsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval, /* check version */ if (crypto_info->version != TLS_1_2_VERSION && crypto_info->version != TLS_1_3_VERSION) { - rc = -ENOTSUPP; + rc = -EINVAL;
This one I think Willem asked to be EOPNOTSUPP OTOH.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
goto err_crypto_info; }@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ static int tls_init(struct sock *sk) * share the ulp context. */ if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -ENOTCONN; /* allocate tls context */ write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c index da9f9ce51e7b..2969dc30e4e0 100644 --- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c +++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c@@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ int tls_sw_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size) int ret = 0; if (msg->msg_flags & ~(MSG_MORE | MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL)) - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -EOPNOTSUPP; mutex_lock(&tls_ctx->tx_lock); lock_sock(sk);@@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ int tls_sw_sendpage_locked(struct sock *sk, struct page *page, if (flags & ~(MSG_MORE | MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL | MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST | MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY | MSG_NO_SHARED_FRAGS)) - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -EOPNOTSUPP; return tls_sw_do_sendpage(sk, page, offset, size, flags); }@@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ int tls_sw_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page *page, if (flags & ~(MSG_MORE | MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL | MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST | MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY)) - return -ENOTSUPP; + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Same suggestion for flags checks in tls_sw.c
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
mutex_lock(&tls_ctx->tx_lock); lock_sock(sk);@@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos, /* splice does not support reading control messages */ if (ctx->control != TLS_RECORD_TYPE_DATA) { - err = -ENOTSUPP; + err = -EINVAL; goto splice_read_end; }