On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:45 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
[off-list ref] wrote:
Em Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 08:39:28AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu:
quoted
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 5:45 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Another fix I'm carrying in my perf/core branch,
quoted
Why in perf/core?
I very much prefer all libbpf patches to go via normal route via bpf/net trees.
We had enough conflicts in this merge window. Let's avoid them.
Humm, if we both carry the same patch the merge process can do its magic
and nobody gets hurt? Besides these are really minor things, no?
I thought so too, but learned the hard lesson recently.
We should try to avoid that as much as possible.
Andrii's is fixing stuff in the same lines:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1201344/
these two patches will likely conflict. I'd rather have them both in bpf tree.
What is the value for this patch in perf tree?
To fix the build on 32-bit arches, right?
But how urgent is it? Can you wait few days until this one and other
libbpf fixes
land via bpf/net trees?