Re: [PATCH net-next 15/15] bnxt_en: Add support for devlink info command
From: Jakub Kicinski <hidden>
Date: 2019-11-23 19:55:15
On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 03:26:10 -0500, Michael Chan wrote:
From: Vasundhara Volam <redacted>
Display the following information via devlink info command:
- Driver name
- Board id
- Broad revision
- Board Serial number
- Board Package version
- FW version
- FW management version
- FW RoCE version
Standard output example:
$ devlink dev info pci/0000:3b:00.0
pci/0000:3b:00.0:
driver bnxt_en
serial_number B0-26-28-FF-FE-25-84-20
versions:
fixed:
board.id C454
board.rev 1
running:
board.package N/AJust don't report it if you don't have it?
fw.version 216.0.154.32004
fw.mgmt 864.0.0.0
fw.app 216.0.51.0
Cc: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Vasundhara Volam <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>+static int bnxt_dl_info_get(struct devlink *dl, struct devlink_info_req *req,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ struct bnxt *bp = bnxt_get_bp_from_dl(dl);
+ union devlink_param_value nvm_cfg_ver;
+ struct hwrm_ver_get_output *ver_resp;
+ char mgmt_ver[FW_VER_STR_LEN];
+ char roce_ver[FW_VER_STR_LEN];
+ char fw_ver[FW_VER_STR_LEN];
+ char buf[32];
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = devlink_info_driver_name_put(req, DRV_MODULE_NAME);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ sprintf(buf, "%X", bp->chip_num);
+ rc = devlink_info_version_fixed_put(req, "board.id", buf);Are you sure chip_num is the board id and not the asic id? Is this the board version or the silicon version? Also please use the defines: DEVLINK_INFO_VERSION_GENERIC_BOARD_ID.
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ ver_resp = &bp->ver_resp;
+ sprintf(buf, "%X", ver_resp->chip_rev);
+ rc = devlink_info_version_fixed_put(req, "board.rev", buf);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ if (BNXT_PF(bp)) {
+ sprintf(buf, "%02X-%02X-%02X-%02X-%02X-%02X-%02X-%02X",
+ bp->dsn[7], bp->dsn[6], bp->dsn[5], bp->dsn[4],
+ bp->dsn[3], bp->dsn[2], bp->dsn[1], bp->dsn[0]);
+ rc = devlink_info_serial_number_put(req, buf);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ if (strlen(ver_resp->active_pkg_name)) {
+ rc =
+ devlink_info_version_running_put(req, "board.package",
+ ver_resp->active_pkg_name);What's a board package? What HW people call a "module"? All devlink info versions should be documented in devlink-info-versions.rst. What are the possible values here? Reporting free form strings read from FW is going to be a tough sell. Probably worth dropping this one if you want the rest merged for 5.5.
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ if (BNXT_PF(bp) && !bnxt_hwrm_get_nvm_cfg_ver(bp, &nvm_cfg_ver)) {
+ u32 ver = nvm_cfg_ver.vu32;
+
+ sprintf(buf, "%X.%X.%X", (ver >> 16) & 0xF, (ver >> 8) & 0xF,
+ ver & 0xF);
+ rc = devlink_info_version_running_put(req, "board.nvm_cfg_ver",ditto
+ buf);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ if (ver_resp->flags & VER_GET_RESP_FLAGS_EXT_VER_AVAIL) {
+ snprintf(fw_ver, FW_VER_STR_LEN, "%d.%d.%d.%d",
+ ver_resp->hwrm_fw_major, ver_resp->hwrm_fw_minor,
+ ver_resp->hwrm_fw_build, ver_resp->hwrm_fw_patch);
+
+ snprintf(mgmt_ver, FW_VER_STR_LEN, "%d.%d.%d.%d",
+ ver_resp->mgmt_fw_major, ver_resp->mgmt_fw_minor,
+ ver_resp->mgmt_fw_build, ver_resp->mgmt_fw_patch);
+
+ snprintf(roce_ver, FW_VER_STR_LEN, "%d.%d.%d.%d",
+ ver_resp->roce_fw_major, ver_resp->roce_fw_minor,
+ ver_resp->roce_fw_build, ver_resp->roce_fw_patch);
+ } else {
+ snprintf(fw_ver, FW_VER_STR_LEN, "%d.%d.%d.%d",
+ ver_resp->hwrm_fw_maj_8b, ver_resp->hwrm_fw_min_8b,
+ ver_resp->hwrm_fw_bld_8b, ver_resp->hwrm_fw_rsvd_8b);
+
+ snprintf(mgmt_ver, FW_VER_STR_LEN, "%d.%d.%d.%d",
+ ver_resp->mgmt_fw_maj_8b, ver_resp->mgmt_fw_min_8b,
+ ver_resp->mgmt_fw_bld_8b, ver_resp->mgmt_fw_rsvd_8b);
+
+ snprintf(roce_ver, FW_VER_STR_LEN, "%d.%d.%d.%d",
+ ver_resp->roce_fw_maj_8b, ver_resp->roce_fw_min_8b,
+ ver_resp->roce_fw_bld_8b, ver_resp->roce_fw_rsvd_8b);
+ }
+ rc = devlink_info_version_running_put(req, "fw.version", fw_ver);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ if (!(bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5)) {
+ rc = devlink_info_version_running_put(req, "fw.mgmt", mgmt_ver);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ rc = devlink_info_version_running_put(req, "fw.app", roce_ver);Should this be fw.roce? Is the NIC ROCE centric, IOW the data path is all ROCE? What's hwrm? perhaps that's the datapath microcode version?
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int bnxt_hwrm_nvm_req(struct bnxt *bp, u32 param_id, void *msg,
int msg_len, union devlink_param_value *val)
{