Re: [bpf-next PATCH] bpf: libbpf, add kernel version section parsing back
From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2019-10-19 01:33:32
Also in:
bpf
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 9:52 AM Andrii Nakryiko [off-list ref] wrote:
On 10/18/19 7:41 AM, John Fastabend wrote:quoted
With commit "libbpf: stop enforcing kern_version,..." we removed the kernel version section parsing in favor of querying for the kernel using uname() and populating the version using the result of the query. After this any version sections were simply ignored. Unfortunately, the world of kernels is not so friendly. I've found some customized kernels where uname() does not match the in kernel version. To fix this so programs can load in this environment this patch adds back parsing the section and if it exists uses the user specified kernel version to override the uname() result. However, keep most the kernel uname() discovery bits so users are not required to insert the version except in these odd cases. Fixes: 5e61f27070292 ("libbpf: stop enforcing kern_version, populate it for users") Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> ---In the name of not breaking users of weird kernels :) Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <redacted>
What does it mean that uname is cheated? Can libbpf read it from /proc/sys/kernel/osrelease ? or /proc/version? Is that read only or user space can somehow overwrite it?