Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] perf tools: add parse events append error

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:32 PM Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 08:14:36AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 12:58 AM Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:01:54PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:

quoted

Parse event error handling may overwrite one error string with another
creating memory leaks and masking errors. Introduce a helper routine
that appends error messages and avoids the memory leak.

A reproduction of this problem can be seen with:
  perf stat -e c/c/
After this change this produces:
event syntax error: 'c/c/'
                       \___ unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: unknown term (previous error: Cannot find PMU `c'. Missing kernel support?)(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,pc,in_tx,edge,any,offcore_rsp,in_tx_cp,ldlat,inv,umask,frontend,cmask,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))(help: valid terms: event,filter_rem,filter_opc0,edge,filter_isoc,filter_tid,filter_loc,filter_nc,inv,umask,filter_opc1,tid_en,thresh,filter_all_op,filter_not_nm,filter_state,filter_nm,config,config1,config2,name,period,percore))

hum... I'd argue that the previous state was better:

[jolsa@krava perf]$ ./perf stat -e c/c/
event syntax error: 'c/c/'
                       \___ unknown term


jirka

I am agnostic. We can either have the previous state or the new state,
I'm keen to resolve the memory leak. Another alternative is to warn
that multiple errors have occurred before dropping or printing the
previous error. As the code is shared in memory places the approach
taken here was to try to not conceal anything that could potentially
be useful. Given this, is the preference to keep the status quo
without any warning?

if the other alternative is string above, yes.. but perhaps
keeping just the first error would be the best way?

here it seems to be the:
   "Cannot find PMU `c'. Missing kernel support?)(help: valid..."

I think this is a reasonable idea. I'd propose doing it as an
additional patch, the purpose of this patch is to avoid a possible
memory leak. I can write the patch and base it on this series.
To resolve the issue, I'd add an extra first error to the struct
parse_events_error. All callers would need to be responsible for
cleaning this up when present, which is why I'd rather not make it
part of this patch.
Does this sound reasonable?

Thanks,
Ian

jirka