Re: [RFC PATCH 11/13] vsock: add 'transport_hg' to handle g2h\h2g transports
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Date: 2019-10-10 13:04:44
Also in:
kvm, linux-hyperv, lkml
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Date: 2019-10-10 13:04:44
Also in:
kvm, linux-hyperv, lkml
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 02:16:43PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:27:01PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:quoted
VMCI transport provides both g2h and h2g behaviors in a single transport. We are able to set (or not) the g2h behavior, detecting if we are in a VMware guest (or not), but the h2g feature is always set. This prevents to load other h2g transports while we are in a VMware guest.In the vhost_vsock.ko case we only register the h2g transport when userspace has loaded the module (by opening /dev/vhost-vsock). VMCI has something kind of similar: /dev/vmci and the vmci_host_active_users counter. Maybe we can use this instead of introducing the transport_hg concept?
Yes, maybe we can register the host in the vmci_host_do_init_context(). I also don't like a lot the transport_hg concept, so I'll try to found an alternative. Thanks, Stefano