On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:27 AM Richard Guy Briggs [off-list ref] wrote:
I'd like your perspective on how the capcontid feature was implemented
(aside from the proc/netlink api issue which was intended to be
consistent across loginuid/sessionid/contid/capcontid). Do you see this
feature as potentially solving the nested container issue in child user
namespaces?
The patchset is a bit messy at this point in the stack due to the
"fixup!" confusion and a few other things which I already mentioned so
I don't really want to comment too much on that until I can see
everything in a reasonable patch stack. Let's leave that for the next
draft.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com