Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] sfc: perform XDP processing on received packets.
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hidden>
Date: 2019-10-22 22:45:23
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 16:38:27 +0100 Charles McLachlan [off-list ref] wrote:
+/** efx_do_xdp: perform XDP processing on a received packet
+ *
+ * Returns true if packet should still be delivered.
+ */
+static bool efx_do_xdp(struct efx_nic *efx, struct efx_channel *channel,
+ struct efx_rx_buffer *rx_buf, u8 **ehp)
+{
+ u8 rx_prefix[EFX_MAX_RX_PREFIX_SIZE];
+ struct efx_rx_queue *rx_queue;
+ struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
+ struct xdp_buff xdp;
+ u32 xdp_act;
+ s16 offset;
+ int rc;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ xdp_prog = rcu_dereference(efx->xdp_prog);
+ if (!xdp_prog) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ rx_queue = efx_channel_get_rx_queue(channel);
+
+ if (unlikely(channel->rx_pkt_n_frags > 1)) {
+ /* We can't do XDP on fragmented packets - drop. */
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ efx_free_rx_buffers(rx_queue, rx_buf,
+ channel->rx_pkt_n_frags);
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ netif_err(efx, rx_err, efx->net_dev,
+ "XDP is not possible with multiple receive fragments (%d)\n",
+ channel->rx_pkt_n_frags);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&efx->pci_dev->dev, rx_buf->dma_addr,
+ rx_buf->len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+
+ /* Save the rx prefix. */
+ EFX_WARN_ON_PARANOID(efx->rx_prefix_size > EFX_MAX_RX_PREFIX_SIZE);
+ memcpy(rx_prefix, *ehp - efx->rx_prefix_size,
+ efx->rx_prefix_size);
+
+ xdp.data = *ehp;
+ xdp.data_hard_start = xdp.data - XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;
+
+ /* No support yet for XDP metadata */
+ xdp_set_data_meta_invalid(&xdp);
+ xdp.data_end = xdp.data + rx_buf->len;
+ xdp.rxq = &rx_queue->xdp_rxq_info;
+
+ xdp_act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(xdp_prog, &xdp);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ offset = (u8 *)xdp.data - *ehp;
+
+ switch (xdp_act) {
+ case XDP_PASS:
+ /* Fix up rx prefix. */
+ if (offset) {
+ *ehp += offset;
+ rx_buf->page_offset += offset;
+ rx_buf->len -= offset;
+ memcpy(*ehp - efx->rx_prefix_size, rx_prefix,
+ efx->rx_prefix_size);
+ }
+ break;
+
+ case XDP_TX:
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ case XDP_REDIRECT:
+ rc = xdp_do_redirect(efx->net_dev, &xdp, xdp_prog);
+ if (rc) {Can we call the 'rc' variable 'err' instead? And give it an unlikely().
+ efx_free_rx_buffers(rx_queue, rx_buf, 1); + if (net_ratelimit()) + netif_err(efx, rx_err, efx->net_dev, + "XDP redirect failed (%d)\n", rc); + } + break; + + default: + bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(xdp_act); + /* Fall through */ + case XDP_ABORTED: + efx_free_rx_buffers(rx_queue, rx_buf, 1); + break; + + case XDP_DROP: + efx_free_rx_buffers(rx_queue, rx_buf, 1); + break; + } + + return xdp_act == XDP_PASS; +} +
-- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer