Re: [PATCH] bpf: use flexible array members, not zero-length

[PATCH] bpf: use flexible array members, not zero-length · Stephen Kitt <hidden> · 2019-09-28
Re: [PATCH] bpf: use flexible array members, not zero-length · Gustavo A. R. Silva <hidden> · 2019-09-28
Re: [PATCH] bpf: use flexible array members, not zero-length · Song Liu <hidden> · 2019-09-30
[PATCH v2] bpf: use flexible array members, not zero-length · Stephen Kitt <hidden> · 2019-09-30
Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: use flexible array members, not zero-length · Gustavo A. R. Silva <hidden> · 2019-09-30
Re: [PATCH] bpf: use flexible array members, not zero-length · Stephen Kitt <hidden> · 2019-09-30
Re: [PATCH] bpf: use flexible array members, not zero-length · Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> · 2019-09-30

From: Stephen Kitt <hidden>
Date: 2019-09-30 08:19:51
Also in: bpf, linux-doc

Le 30/09/2019 08:07, Song Liu a écrit :

quoted

On Sep 28, 2019, at 10:49 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva 
[off-list ref] wrote:
I think you should preserve the tab here.

Agreed.

Indeed (and I thought I’d checked whitespace changes!). V2 upcoming with 
an improved Coccinelle script which preserves whitespace and fixes a 
couple of other issues which appear in other files (attributes, and 
structs defined alongside the field declaration).

Besides this:

Acked-by: Song Liu <redacted>

Thanks!

Regards,

Stephen

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help