Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 4 authors, 2019-09-29

Re: [PATCH] vhost: introduce mdev based hardware backend

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2019-09-27 03:27:29
Also in: kvm, lkml

On 2019/9/26 下午9:14, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:35:18AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:54:27PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
index 40d028eed645..5afbc2f08fa3 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost.h
@@ -116,4 +116,12 @@
  #define VHOST_VSOCK_SET_GUEST_CID	_IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x60, __u64)
  #define VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING		_IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x61, int)
  
+/* VHOST_MDEV specific defines */
+
+#define VHOST_MDEV_SET_STATE	_IOW(VHOST_VIRTIO, 0x70, __u64)
+
+#define VHOST_MDEV_S_STOPPED	0
+#define VHOST_MDEV_S_RUNNING	1
+#define VHOST_MDEV_S_MAX	2
+
  #endif
So assuming we have an underlying device that behaves like virtio:
I think they are really good questions/suggestions. Thanks!
quoted
1. Should we use SET_STATUS maybe?
I like this idea. I will give it a try.
quoted
2. Do we want a reset ioctl?
I think it is helpful. If we use SET_STATUS, maybe we
can use it to support the reset.
quoted
3. Do we want ability to enable rings individually?
I will make it possible at least in the vhost layer.

Note the API support e.g set_vq_ready().

quoted
4. Does device need to limit max ring size?
5. Does device need to limit max number of queues?
I think so. It's helpful to have ioctls to report the max
ring size and max number of queues.

An issue is the max number of queues is done through a device specific 
way, usually device configuration space. This is supported by the 
transport API, but how to expose it to userspace may need more thought.

Thanks

Thanks!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help