Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 2 authors, 2019-09-03

Re: WARNING in __mark_chain_precision (2)

From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2019-09-03 00:40:20
Also in: bpf, lkml

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:28 AM syzbot
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hello,

syzbot found the following crash on:

HEAD commit:    47ee6e86 selftests/bpf: remove wrong nhoff in flow dissect..
git tree:       bpf-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16227fa6600000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=d4cf1ffb87d590d7
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c8d66267fd2b5955287e
compiler:       gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=10d26ebc600000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=127805ca600000

IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+c8d66267fd2b5955287e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

------------[ cut here ]------------
verifier backtracking bug
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 8795 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1782
__mark_chain_precision+0x197a/0x1ea0 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1782
fyi
I found some time to debug it.
The following program will be incorrectly rejected
due to precision tracking bug.
(b7) r2 = 0
(bf) r3 = r10
(16) if w3 == 0xf6fffdfd goto pc+0
(7a) *(u64 *)(r3 -16) = -8
(79) r4 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)
(b7) r6 = -1
(2d) if r4 > r6 goto pc+5

Still thinking how to fix it cleanly.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help