Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] sctp: add spt_pathcpthld in struct sctp_paddrthlds
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-09-11 09:38:48
Also in:
linux-sctp
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 5:21 PM Xin Long [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 5:03 PM David Laight [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Xin Long [mailto:lucien.xin@gmail.com]quoted
Sent: 11 September 2019 09:52 On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 9:19 PM David Laight [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Xin Longquoted
Sent: 09 September 2019 08:57 Section 7.2 of rfc7829: "Peer Address Thresholds (SCTP_PEER_ADDR_THLDS) Socket Option" extends 'struct sctp_paddrthlds' with 'spt_pathcpthld' added to allow a user to change ps_retrans per sock/asoc/transport, as other 2 paddrthlds: pf_retrans, pathmaxrxt. Note that ps_retrans is not allowed to be greater than pf_retrans. Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> --- include/uapi/linux/sctp.h | 1 + net/sctp/socket.c | 10 ++++++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/sctp.h b/include/uapi/linux/sctp.h index a15cc28..dfd81e1 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/sctp.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/sctp.h@@ -1069,6 +1069,7 @@ struct sctp_paddrthlds { struct sockaddr_storage spt_address; __u16 spt_pathmaxrxt; __u16 spt_pathpfthld; + __u16 spt_pathcpthld; }; /*diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c index 5e2098b..5b9774d 100644 --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c@@ -3954,6 +3954,9 @@ static int sctp_setsockopt_paddr_thresholds(struct sock *sk,This code does: if (optlen < sizeof(struct sctp_paddrthlds)) return -EINVAL;here will become: if (optlen >= sizeof(struct sctp_paddrthlds)) { optlen = sizeof(struct sctp_paddrthlds); } else if (optlen >= ALIGN(offsetof(struct sctp_paddrthlds, spt_pathcpthld), 4)) optlen = ALIGN(offsetof(struct sctp_paddrthlds, spt_pathcpthld), 4); val.spt_pathcpthld = 0xffff; else { return -EINVAL; }Hmmm... If the kernel has to default 'val.spt_pathcpthld = 0xffff' then recompiling an existing application with the new uapi header is going to lead to very unexpected behaviour. The best you can hope for is that the application memset the structure to zero. But more likely it is 'random' on-stack data.0xffff is a value to disable the feature 'Primary Path Switchover'. you're right that user might set it to zero unexpectly with their old application rebuilt. A safer way is to introduce "sysctl net.sctp.ps_retrans", it won't matter if users set spt_pathcpthld properly when they're not aware of this feature, like "sysctl net.sctp.pF_retrans". Looks better?
Sorry for confusing, "sysctl net.sctp.ps_retrans" is already there
(its value is 0xffff by default),
we just need to do this in sctp_setsockopt_paddr_thresholds():
if (copy_from_user(&val, (struct sctp_paddrthlds __user *)optval,
optlen))
return -EFAULT;
if (sock_net(sk)->sctp.ps_retrans == 0xffff)
val.spt_pathcpthld = 0xffff;
if (val.spt_pathpfthld > val.spt_pathcpthld)
return -EINVAL;
quoted
David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)