Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 4 authors, 2019-09-04

Re: [PATCH net] sctp: use transport pf_retrans in sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike

From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: 2019-09-03 13:16:31
Also in: linux-sctp

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:24:21PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Transport should use its own pf_retrans to do the error_count
check, instead of asoc's. Otherwise, it's meaningless to make
pf_retrans per transport.

Fixes: 5aa93bcf66f4 ("sctp: Implement quick failover draft from tsvwg")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
---
 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
index 1cf5bb5..e52b212 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_cmd_seq *commands,
 	if (net->sctp.pf_enable &&
 	   (transport->state == SCTP_ACTIVE) &&
 	   (transport->error_count < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
-	   (transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans)) {
+	   (transport->error_count > transport->pf_retrans)) {
 
 		sctp_assoc_control_transport(asoc, transport,
 					     SCTP_TRANSPORT_PF,
-- 
2.1.0
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help