Thread (25 messages) flat view 25 messages, 5 authors, 2019-09-01

Re: [PATCH V5 0/9] Fixes for vhost metadata acceleration

From: Jason Wang <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-12 02:44:58
Also in: kvm, linux-mm, lkml

On 2019/8/11 上午1:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:48:42AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
quoted
Hi all:

This series try to fix several issues introduced by meta data
accelreation series. Please review.

Changes from V4:
- switch to use spinlock synchronize MMU notifier with accessors

Changes from V3:
- remove the unnecessary patch

Changes from V2:
- use seqlck helper to synchronize MMU notifier with vhost worker

Changes from V1:
- try not use RCU to syncrhonize MMU notifier with vhost worker
- set dirty pages after no readers
- return -EAGAIN only when we find the range is overlapped with
   metadata

Jason Wang (9):
   vhost: don't set uaddr for invalid address
   vhost: validate MMU notifier registration
   vhost: fix vhost map leak
   vhost: reset invalidate_count in vhost_set_vring_num_addr()
   vhost: mark dirty pages during map uninit
   vhost: don't do synchronize_rcu() in vhost_uninit_vq_maps()
   vhost: do not use RCU to synchronize MMU notifier with worker
   vhost: correctly set dirty pages in MMU notifiers callback
   vhost: do not return -EAGAIN for non blocking invalidation too early

  drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
  drivers/vhost/vhost.h |   6 +-
  2 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
This generally looks more solid.

But this amounts to a significant overhaul of the code.

At this point how about we revert 7f466032dc9e5a61217f22ea34b2df932786bbfc
for this release, and then re-apply a corrected version
for the next one?

If possible, consider we've actually disabled the feature. How about 
just queued those patches for next release?

Thanks

quoted
-- 
2.18.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help