Re: [PATCH V5 0/9] Fixes for vhost metadata acceleration
From: Jason Wang <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-12 02:44:58
Also in:
kvm, linux-mm, lkml
On 2019/8/11 上午1:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:48:42AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
Hi all: This series try to fix several issues introduced by meta data accelreation series. Please review. Changes from V4: - switch to use spinlock synchronize MMU notifier with accessors Changes from V3: - remove the unnecessary patch Changes from V2: - use seqlck helper to synchronize MMU notifier with vhost worker Changes from V1: - try not use RCU to syncrhonize MMU notifier with vhost worker - set dirty pages after no readers - return -EAGAIN only when we find the range is overlapped with metadata Jason Wang (9): vhost: don't set uaddr for invalid address vhost: validate MMU notifier registration vhost: fix vhost map leak vhost: reset invalidate_count in vhost_set_vring_num_addr() vhost: mark dirty pages during map uninit vhost: don't do synchronize_rcu() in vhost_uninit_vq_maps() vhost: do not use RCU to synchronize MMU notifier with worker vhost: correctly set dirty pages in MMU notifiers callback vhost: do not return -EAGAIN for non blocking invalidation too early drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 6 +- 2 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)This generally looks more solid. But this amounts to a significant overhaul of the code. At this point how about we revert 7f466032dc9e5a61217f22ea34b2df932786bbfc for this release, and then re-apply a corrected version for the next one?
If possible, consider we've actually disabled the feature. How about just queued those patches for next release? Thanks
quoted
-- 2.18.1