Re: [PATCH] net: sctp: Rename fallthrough label to unhandled
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: 2019-08-01 20:48:47
Also in:
linux-sctp, lkml
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: 2019-08-01 20:48:47
Also in:
linux-sctp, lkml
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:42:31AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 06:50 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 03:23:46PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:[]quoted
You can say that if you want, but you made the point that your think the macro as you have written is more readable. You example illustrates though that /* fallthrough */ is a pretty common comment, and not prefixing it makes it look like someone didn't add a comment that they meant to. The __ prefix is standard practice for defining macros to attributes (212 instances of it by my count). I don't mind rewriting the goto labels at all, but I think consistency is valuable.Hey Neil. Perhaps you want to make this argument on the RFC patch thread that introduces the fallthrough pseudo-keyword. https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1108577/
Sure, but it will have to wait for tomorrow at this point, as I need to run to an appointment. Best Neil