On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:02:46PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:

+static int sctp_setsockopt_asconf_supported(struct sock *sk,
+					    char __user *optval,
+					    unsigned int optlen)
+{
+	struct sctp_assoc_value params;
+	struct sctp_association *asoc;
+	struct sctp_endpoint *ep;
+	int retval = -EINVAL;
+
+	if (optlen != sizeof(params))
+		goto out;
+
+	if (copy_from_user(&params, optval, optlen)) {
+		retval = -EFAULT;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	asoc = sctp_id2assoc(sk, params.assoc_id);
+	if (!asoc && params.assoc_id != SCTP_FUTURE_ASSOC &&
+	    sctp_style(sk, UDP))
+		goto out;
+
+	ep = sctp_sk(sk)->ep;
+	ep->asconf_enable = !!params.assoc_value;

Considering this will be negotiated on handshake, shouldn't it deny
changes to Established asocs? (Same for Auth)

+
+	if (ep->asconf_enable && ep->auth_enable) {
+		sctp_auth_ep_add_chunkid(ep, SCTP_CID_ASCONF);
+		sctp_auth_ep_add_chunkid(ep, SCTP_CID_ASCONF_ACK);
+	}
+
+	retval = 0;
+
+out:
+	return retval;
+}