Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2019-08-14

Re: [PATCH net] sctp: fix the transport error_count check

From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Date: 2019-08-13 16:27:40
Also in: linux-sctp

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 08:49:12PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
As the annotation says in sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike():

  "If the transport error count is greater than the pf_retrans
   threshold, and less than pathmaxrtx ..."

It should be transport->error_count checked with pathmaxrxt,
instead of asoc->pf_retrans.

Fixes: 5aa93bcf66f4 ("sctp: Implement quick failover draft from tsvwg")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>

Dave, please consider this one for stable. Thanks.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
index a554d6d..1cf5bb5 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike(struct sctp_cmd_seq *commands,
 	 */
 	if (net->sctp.pf_enable &&
 	   (transport->state == SCTP_ACTIVE) &&
-	   (asoc->pf_retrans < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
+	   (transport->error_count < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
 	   (transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans)) {
 
 		sctp_assoc_control_transport(asoc, transport,
-- 
2.1.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help